<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>J. Lilly &#124; Marketing Genius &#187; Advertising Science</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jlilly.com/wordpress/category/advertising-science/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jlilly.com/wordpress</link>
	<description>Hosted by John Lilly, Marketing Director at Arrow Sign Company</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 08:37:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Focus and Sacrifice are the Keys to Marketing Success</title>
		<link>http://jlilly.com/wordpress/focus-sacrifice-key-marketing-success/</link>
		<comments>http://jlilly.com/wordpress/focus-sacrifice-key-marketing-success/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 18:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John@ArrowSign.net</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inspiration & Motivation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rants and Raves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[focus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[success]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jlilly.com/wordpress/?p=406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["You have to stop trying to be everything to everyone."]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Make the Ultimate Marketing Sacrifice</strong><br />
<em>by Chad Rueffert</em></p>
<p>“It’s the ultimate marketing sacrifice.” That’s what world-renown  marketing consultants Jack Trout and Al Ries have to say about <strong>FOCUS</strong>.  Over and  over, in every book they’ve written, they repeat a mantra that too many  people ignore: “Good things happen when you contract, rather than expand   your brand or business.”</p>
<p>Anyone who has the word “marketing” anywhere in their title or job  description should own every book ever written by either of these two  men. You  should also require yourself to re-read them every 3 months or so, and  give copies  to every senior-level person in your organization. You’ll find they’ve  put into words every good instinct you’ve ever had about marketing, and  have a viable explanation for every failure you’ve ever made.</p>
<p>But back to <strong>FOCUS</strong>. If the goal of every company is to grow (which it  invariably  is), then why do Trout and Ries suggest that good things happen when you  contract  your business? If I had to sum it up in one word, it would be  “CONFUSION.”</p>
<p>Let’s consider some examples provided by Al Ries and Laura Ries in their   book “The 22 Immutable Laws of Branding.” American Express used to  be a premier credit card with the slogan “Membership Has Its  Privileges.”  It was exclusive, prestigious, the card for people with money. It  provided status  and respectability. Membership really did have its privileges. In 1988,  American  Express had a handful of card choices and 27 percent of the market. Then  they  lost their <strong>focus</strong>. They wanted to grow, and their CEO decided the best  way to do  that was to introduce twelve to fifteen new cards each year. We started  seeing  the Optima Card, the Optima Golf Card, the Optima Rewards Card, the card  for students,  a card for seniors, cards with airline miles.</p>
<p>American Express lost its <strong>focus</strong>. They were no longer the card for the  wealthy  status seeker. They tried to become the card for everyone. In doing so,  they created  confusion in the mind of the consumer. American Express no longer stands  for anything  identifiable.</p>
<p>Today, American Express has less than 18% of the market. They introduced  a bunch  of new cards, lost their <strong>focus</strong>, created confusion and it cost them 1/3  of their  market share.</p>
<p>A company that is <strong>focused</strong> allows the consumer to easily identify with  that company  and product. Take Kraft Foods for example. What are they known for? Does  any one  product come to mind? No. Because they make just about everything. They  are a  marketing generalist and the companies that are more narrowly focused  are beating  them at almost everything. Kraft has about 9% of the market in jellies  and jams.  Smucker’s has 35%. Kraft has 18% of the mayonnaise market. Hellmann’s  has 42%. When you try to make your brand mean everything to everyone,  you end  up meaning nothing to anyone.</p>
<p>So, how do you get a marketing <strong>focus</strong>? It takes sacrifice. <strong><em>You have to  stop trying  to be everything to everyone.</em></strong> You have to find a category you can  dominate. Federal  Express built its success not by providing every type of shipping  service available.  They <strong>focused</strong> on overnight packages only. They had to sacrifice a big  part of the  potential shipping market to do that, but it paid off by making their  brand name  synonymous with overnight delivery. Domino’s Pizza, Little Caesar’s  and Papa John’s all started out selling a wide variety of fast foods,  from  fish and chips to fried mushrooms. Customers found the selection way too  confusing.  By sacrificing the potential non-pizza business, each company became  more successful.</p>
<p>You’ve got to be the best at one thing. Or, more correctly, be perceived   as the best in the minds of your customers. If you only make pizza, you  must be  an expert at it. If you make pizza and subs and salads and tacos, you  won’t  be seen as the best at anything.</p>
<p>Your customers must see your name and immediately associate one word or  phrase  with it. Volvo means safety. Xerox means copiers. Intel means  microprocessors.  You must narrow your <strong>focus</strong> down to one, identifiable thing and then own  it.</p>
<p>If you are just starting your business, sacrifice some of the sales  potential  available in trying to sell everything in order to build an identifiable  brand  name in one thing. Then stick to it. If your business already exists,  look at  what weak portion of it you might sacrifice in order to narrow your <strong> focus</strong> and  own that portion of the market. These are the things that remove the  confusion  in the customer’s mind, that allow them to hear the name of your company   and know exactly what it means. When you’ve done that, you have built a  brand name that, properly maintained, will lead to long-term success.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jlilly.com/wordpress/focus-sacrifice-key-marketing-success/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How our brains build social worlds &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://jlilly.com/wordpress/how-our-brains-build-social-worlds/</link>
		<comments>http://jlilly.com/wordpress/how-our-brains-build-social-worlds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 05:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John@ArrowSign.net</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inspiration & Motivation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Signs of the Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech Geek]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jlilly.com/wordpress/?p=383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;This raises the interesting question of how our brains deal with deception. Somehow, a balance has to be struck: it would be too costly to question the motive behind every interaction, but taking everything at face value makes us vulnerable. Neuroscientists have become very interested in the differences in brain activity between interacting with a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;This raises the interesting question of how our brains deal with deception. Somehow, a balance has to be struck: it would be too costly to question the motive behind every interaction, but taking everything at face value makes us vulnerable. Neuroscientists have become very interested in the differences in brain activity between interacting with a person considered trustworthy and one perceived as dangerous and deceptive.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;One key difference may be a shift in the balance between unconscious mirroring of another person&#8217;s actions and expressions and conscious attempts to grasp the other&#8217;s motives. This may lead to a decoupling from the other, a kind of separation within the interaction, as activity diminishes in areas that mirror experiences, while higher-order, cognitive frontal functions kick in.&#8221;</p>
<p>via <a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20427370.500-how-our-brains-build-social-worlds.html?page=2">How our brains build social worlds &#8211; opinion &#8211; 02 December 2009 &#8211; New Scientist</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jlilly.com/wordpress/how-our-brains-build-social-worlds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
